Does the notion of intelligent design make sense from a scientific standpoint? Does intelligent design makes sense from an observational standpoint? One thinker in an online think tank forum stated so. And so the other thinkers responded and considered some of what the other fellow think tanker had commented on. In one response a man posted this comment:

The intelligent design; that is to say the DNA, reciprocating forces of nature, food chain sustainability and all the balancing forces we rely on for life, do appear to be purposeful. Indeed they are mandatory for our particular life form in the way we are currently set up to live within it. Although that does not automatically assume that there is a God or set of Gods, which is explained in religious doctrines that made it so. Order cannot exist without chaos and chaos would not be definable without order. And without choice, freedom and liberty, life would be unworthy of it all. God, Gods or no God.

Indeed there are some pretty good observations that could suggest intelligent design, but it seems we are still without the ultimate proof in where is the murder weapon and who would do such a thing? And of course what motive would they have in designing such a system and why would they include these animals and god-forsaken humans and ruin what could have been a very nice almost perfect system? Consider this in 2006.